On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 02:16:20AM +0000, Zhijian Li (Fujitsu) wrote: > > > On 19/09/2023 17:30, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 04:26:54PM +0800, Zhu Yanjun wrote: > >> > >> 在 2023/9/19 16:17, Leon Romanovsky 写道: > >>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:08:06AM +0800, Zhu Yanjun wrote: > >>>> From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> No functionality change. The variable which is not initialized fully > >>>> will introduce potential risks. > >>> Are you sure about not being initialized? > >> > >> About this problem, I think we discussed it previously in RDMA maillist. > >> > >> And at that time, IIRC, you shared a link with me. The link is as below. > >> > >> https://www.ex-parrot.com/~chris/random/initialise.html > >> > >> From what we discussed and the above link, I think it is not initialized > >> fully. > > > > I remember that discussion and it was about slightly different thing: > > {} vs {0} in Linux kernel. > > > Well, in my mind, I thought they are the same. see: https://www.gnu.org/software/gnu-c-manual/gnu-c-manual.html#Initializing-Structure-Members It is GCC specific implementation, the original discussion was about C-standard. Thanks
