On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 08:27:25 +0000, ynachum@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> When trying to destroy QP or CQ, we first decrease the refcount and
> potentially free memory regions allocated for the object and then
> request the device to destroy the object. If the device fails, the
> object isn't fully destroyed so the user/IB core can try to destroy the
> object again which will lead to underflow when trying to decrease an
> already zeroed refcount.
> Deallocate resources in reverse order of allocating them to safely free
> them.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] RDMA/efa: Fix wrong resources deallocation order
https://git.kernel.org/rdma/rdma/c/dc202c57e9a142
Best regards,
--
Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
