> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, 21 August 2023 10:48
> To: Bernard Metzler <BMT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; jgg@xxxxxxxx; leon@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH V2 2/3] RDMA/siw: Correct wrong debug message
>
> We need to print num_sle first then pbl->max_buf per the condition.
> Also replace mem->pbl with pbl while at it.
>
> Fixes: 303ae1cdfdf7 ("rdma/siw: application interface")
> Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c
> b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c
> index 398ec13db624..4832723dc244 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c
> @@ -1494,7 +1494,7 @@ int siw_map_mr_sg(struct ib_mr *base_mr, struct
> scatterlist *sl, int num_sle,
>
> if (pbl->max_buf < num_sle) {
> siw_dbg_mem(mem, "too many SGE's: %d > %d\n",
> - mem->pbl->max_buf, num_sle);
> + num_sle, pbl->max_buf);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> for_each_sg(sl, slp, num_sle, i) {
> --
> 2.35.3
makes sense, thank you!
Acked-by: Bernard Metzler <bmt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
