Re: [PATCH net-next] net/mlx4: remove many unnecessary NULL values

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2023/8/1 23:40, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 08:34:22PM +0800, Ruan Jinjie wrote:
>> Ther are many pointers assigned first, which need not to be initialized, so
>> remove the NULL assignment.
> 
> How about something like:
> 
> Don't initialise local variables to NULL which are always
> set to other values elsewhere in the same function.

I think these NULL assignments can also be removed.

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ...
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
> 
> ...
> 
>> @@ -2294,8 +2294,8 @@ static int mlx4_init_fw(struct mlx4_dev *dev)
>>  static int mlx4_init_hca(struct mlx4_dev *dev)
>>  {
>>  	struct mlx4_priv	  *priv = mlx4_priv(dev);
>> -	struct mlx4_init_hca_param *init_hca = NULL;
>> -	struct mlx4_dev_cap	  *dev_cap = NULL;
>> +	struct mlx4_init_hca_param *init_hca;
>> +	struct mlx4_dev_cap	  *dev_cap;
>>  	struct mlx4_adapter	   adapter;
>>  	struct mlx4_profile	   profile;
>>  	u64 icm_size;
> 
> This last hunk doesn't seem correct, as it doesn't
> seem these aren't always initialised elsewhere in the function
> before being passed to kfree().

Yes, this kind of situation the NULL assignments should not be removed,I'll
reserch it more.

> 
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>
>>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux