Re: [PATCH for-next] RDMA/rxe: Fix potential race in rxe_pool_get_index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 05:30:24PM -0500, Bob Pearson wrote:
> Currently the lookup of an object from its index and taking a
> reference to the object are incorrectly protected by an rcu_read_lock
> but this does not make the xa_load and the kref_get combination an
> atomic operation.
> 
> The various write operations need to share the xarray state in a
> mixture of user, soft irq and hard irq contexts so the xa_locking
> must support that.
> 
> This patch replaces the xa locks with xa_lock_irqsave.
> 
> Fixes: 3225717f6dfa ("RDMA/rxe: Replace red-black trees by xarrays")
> Signed-off-by: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_pool.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_pool.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_pool.c
> index 6215c6de3a84..f2b586249793 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_pool.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_pool.c
> @@ -119,8 +119,10 @@ void rxe_pool_cleanup(struct rxe_pool *pool)
>  int __rxe_add_to_pool(struct rxe_pool *pool, struct rxe_pool_elem *elem,
>  				bool sleepable)
>  {
> -	int err;
> +	struct xarray *xa = &pool->xa;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  	gfp_t gfp_flags;
> +	int err;
>  
>  	if (atomic_inc_return(&pool->num_elem) > pool->max_elem)
>  		goto err_cnt;
> @@ -138,8 +140,10 @@ int __rxe_add_to_pool(struct rxe_pool *pool, struct rxe_pool_elem *elem,
>  
>  	if (sleepable)
>  		might_sleep();
> -	err = xa_alloc_cyclic(&pool->xa, &elem->index, NULL, pool->limit,
> +	xa_lock_irqsave(xa, flags);
> +	err = __xa_alloc_cyclic(xa, &elem->index, NULL, pool->limit,
>  			      &pool->next, gfp_flags);
> +	xa_unlock_irqrestore(xa, flags);

This stuff doesn't make any sense, the non __ versions already take
the xa_lock internally.

Or is this because you need the save/restore version for some reason?
But that seems unrelated and there should be a lockdep oops to go
along with it showing the backtrace??

> @@ -154,15 +158,16 @@ void *rxe_pool_get_index(struct rxe_pool *pool, u32 index)
>  {
>  	struct rxe_pool_elem *elem;
>  	struct xarray *xa = &pool->xa;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  	void *obj;
>  
> -	rcu_read_lock();
> +	xa_lock_irqsave(xa, flags);
>  	elem = xa_load(xa, index);
>  	if (elem && kref_get_unless_zero(&elem->ref_cnt))
>  		obj = elem->obj;
>  	else
>  		obj = NULL;
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	xa_unlock_irqrestore(xa, flags);

And this should be safe as long as the object is freed via RCU, so
what are you trying to fix?

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux