Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 01:11:19PM CEST, vadim.fedorenko@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >On 28/06/2023 10:27, Kubalewski, Arkadiusz wrote: >> > From: Kubalewski, Arkadiusz >> > Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2023 11:15 AM >> > >> > > From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 12:18 PM >> > > >> > > Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 02:38:10PM CEST, arkadiusz.kubalewski@xxxxxxxxx >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > > v8 -> v9: >> > > >> > > Could you please address all the unresolved issues from v8 and send v10? >> > > I'm not reviewing this one. >> > > >> > > Thanks! >> > >> > Sure, will do, but first missing to-do/discuss list: >> > 1) remove mode_set as not used by any driver >> > 2) remove "no-added-value" static functions descriptions in >> > dpll_core/dpll_netlink >> > 3) merge patches [ 03/10, 04/10, 05/10 ] into patches that are compiling >> > after each patch apply >> > 4) remove function return values descriptions/lists >> > 5) Fix patch [05/10]: >> > - status Supported >> > - additional maintainers >> > - remove callback: >> > int (*source_pin_idx_get)(...) from `struct dpll_device_ops` >> > 6) Fix patch [08/10]: rethink ice mutex locking scheme >> > 7) Fix patch [09/10]: multiple comments on >> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZIQu+%2Fo4J0ZBspVg@nanopsycho/#t >> > 8) add PPS DPLL phase offset to the netlink get-device API >> > >> > Thank you! >> > Arkadiusz >> >> If someone has any objections please state them now, I will work on >> all above except 5) and 7). >> Vadim, could you take care of those 2 points? >> >Yeah, sure, I'll update 5 and 7. >I'm not sure about 8) - do we really need this info, I believe every >supported DPLL device exports PTP device as well. But I'm Ok to add this >feature too. Could you add the notification work while you are at it? I don't want that to be forgotten. Thanks! > >> Thank you! >> Arkadiusz >
