> -----Original Message----- > From: souradeep chakrabarti <schakrabarti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, June 26, 2023 5:20 AM > To: KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Haiyang Zhang > <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx; Dexuan Cui > <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; > kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; Long Li <longli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Ajay > Sharma <sharmaajay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; leon@xxxxxxxxxx; > cai.huoqing@xxxxxxxxx; ssengar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx; > tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-hyperv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Souradeep Chakrabarti > <schakrabarti@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Souradeep Chakrabarti > <schakrabarti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [PATCH 2/2 V3 net] net: mana: Fix MANA VF unload when host is > unresponsive In general, two patches shouldn't have the same Subject. For this patch set, the two patches are two steps to fix the unloading issue, and they are not very long. IMHO, they should be in one patch. Thanks, - Haiyang
