On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 05:02:23PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>
>
> > On Jun 22, 2023, at 11:13 AM, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 10:00:59AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> We would like to enable the use of siw on top of a VPN that is
> >> constructed and managed via a tun device. That hasn't worked up
> >> until now because ARPHRD_NONE devices (such as tun devices) have
> >> no GID for the RDMA/core to look up.
> >>
> >> But it turns out that the egress device has already been picked for
> >> us -- no GID is necessary. addr_handler() just has to do the right
> >> thing with it.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
> >> index a1756ed1faa1..50b8da2c4720 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
> >> @@ -700,6 +700,19 @@ cma_validate_port(struct ib_device *device, u32 port,
> >> if ((dev_type != ARPHRD_INFINIBAND) && rdma_protocol_ib(device, port))
> >> goto out;
> >>
> >> + if (rdma_protocol_iwarp(device, port)) {
> >> + sgid_attr = rdma_get_gid_attr(device, port, 0);
> >> + if (IS_ERR(sgid_attr))
> >> + goto out;
> >> +
> >> + /* XXX: I don't think this is RCU-safe, but does it need to be? */
> >
> > Maybe for subtle reasons related to iwarp it is safe, but it should
> > make a lockdep splat since you are not holding rcu?
> >
> > Remove the comment and do a rcu_lock/unlock around this and the deref
>
> Done, v4 posted.
>
> The reason I was unsure:
>
> CC drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.o
> CHECK /home/cel/src/linux/linux/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c
> /home/cel/src/linux/linux/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c:292:23: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
> /home/cel/src/linux/linux/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c:292:23: expected struct net_device [noderef] __rcu *[addressable] ndev
> /home/cel/src/linux/linux/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c:292:23: got struct net_device *ndev
> /home/cel/src/linux/linux/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c:386:48: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> /home/cel/src/linux/linux/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c:386:48: expected struct net_device [noderef] __rcu *ndev
> /home/cel/src/linux/linux/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c:386:48: got struct net_device *ndev
> /home/cel/src/linux/linux/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c:811:48: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
> /home/cel/src/linux/linux/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c:811:48: expected void *filter_cookie
> /home/cel/src/linux/linux/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c:811:48: got struct net_device [noderef] __rcu *ndev
> /home/cel/src/linux/linux/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c:814:31: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
> /home/cel/src/linux/linux/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c:814:31: expected struct net_device *dev
> /home/cel/src/linux/linux/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c:814:31: got struct net_device [noderef] __rcu *ndev
> /home/cel/src/linux/linux/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c:851:31: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
> /home/cel/src/linux/linux/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c:851:31: expected struct net_device [noderef] __rcu *ndev
> /home/cel/src/linux/linux/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c:851:31: got struct net_device *ndev
Ah, nobody has cleaned that stuff :\
Jason
