From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxx>
Commit bffaa916588e ("net/mlx5: E-Switch, Add control for inline mode")
added inline mode checking to esw_offloads_start() with a warning
printed out in case there is a problem. Tne inline mode checking was
done even after mlx5_eswitch_enable_locked() call failed, which is
pointless.
Later on, commit 8c98ee77d911 ("net/mlx5e: E-Switch, Add extack messages
to devlink callbacks") converted the error/warning prints to extack
setting, which caused that the inline mode check error to overwrite
possible previous extack message when mlx5_eswitch_enable_locked()
failed. User then gets confusing error message.
Fix this by skipping check of inline mode after
mlx5_eswitch_enable_locked() call failed.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
index 29de4e759f4f..eafb098db6b0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
@@ -2178,6 +2178,7 @@ static int esw_offloads_start(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
"Failed setting eswitch to offloads");
esw->mode = MLX5_ESWITCH_LEGACY;
mlx5_rescan_drivers(esw->dev);
+ return err;
}
if (esw->offloads.inline_mode == MLX5_INLINE_MODE_NONE) {
if (mlx5_eswitch_inline_mode_get(esw,
@@ -2187,7 +2188,7 @@ static int esw_offloads_start(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
"Inline mode is different between vports");
}
}
- return err;
+ return 0;
}
static void mlx5_esw_offloads_rep_mark_set(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
--
2.40.1
