Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] sched/topology: add for_each_numa_cpu() macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 10:01:25AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2023 08:43:46 -0700 Yury Norov wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 10:18:01AM -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > for_each_cpu() is widely used in kernel, and it's beneficial to create
> > > a NUMA-aware version of the macro.
> > > 
> > > Recently added for_each_numa_hop_mask() works, but switching existing
> > > codebase to it is not an easy process.
> > > 
> > > This series adds for_each_numa_cpu(), which is designed to be similar to
> > > the for_each_cpu(). It allows to convert existing code to NUMA-aware as
> > > simple as adding a hop iterator variable and passing it inside new macro.
> > > for_each_numa_cpu() takes care of the rest.  
> > 
> > Hi Jakub,
> > 
> > Now that the series reviewed, can you consider taking it in sched
> > tree?
> 
> Do you mean someone else or did you mean the net-next tree?

Sorry, net-next.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux