On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 10:01:25AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 31 May 2023 08:43:46 -0700 Yury Norov wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 10:18:01AM -0700, Yury Norov wrote: > > > for_each_cpu() is widely used in kernel, and it's beneficial to create > > > a NUMA-aware version of the macro. > > > > > > Recently added for_each_numa_hop_mask() works, but switching existing > > > codebase to it is not an easy process. > > > > > > This series adds for_each_numa_cpu(), which is designed to be similar to > > > the for_each_cpu(). It allows to convert existing code to NUMA-aware as > > > simple as adding a hop iterator variable and passing it inside new macro. > > > for_each_numa_cpu() takes care of the rest. > > > > Hi Jakub, > > > > Now that the series reviewed, can you consider taking it in sched > > tree? > > Do you mean someone else or did you mean the net-next tree? Sorry, net-next.
