On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:29 PM Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:10 PM Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5/23/23 12:02, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 11:47 AM Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 10:26 AM Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 5/23/23 10:13, syzbot wrote:
> > >>>> Hello,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> syzbot tried to test the proposed patch but the build/boot failed:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> failed to apply patch:
> > >>>> checking file drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_qp.c
> > >>>> patch: **** unexpected end of file in patch
> > >> This is not the root cause. The fix is not good.
> > > This problem is about "INFO: trying to register non-static key. The
> > > code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe"
>
> This warning is from "lock is not initialized". This is a
> use-before-initialized problem.
> The correct fix is to initialize the lock that is complained before it is used.
>
> Zhu Yanjun
Based on the call trace, the followings are the order of this call trace.
291 /* called by the create qp verb */
292 int rxe_qp_from_init(struct rxe_dev *rxe, struct rxe_qp *qp,
struct rxe_pd *pd,
297 {
...
317 rxe_qp_init_misc(rxe, qp, init);
...
322
323 err = rxe_qp_init_resp(rxe, qp, init, udata, uresp);
324 if (err)
325 goto err2; <--- error
...
334 err2:
335 rxe_queue_cleanup(qp->sq.queue); <--- Goto here
336 qp->sq.queue = NULL;
In rxe_qp_init_resp, the error occurs before skb_queue_head_init.
So this call trace appeared.
Zhu Yanjun
> >
> > Which is caused by "skb_queue_head_init(&qp->resp_pkts)" is not called
> > given rxe_qp_init_resp returns error, but the cleanup still trigger the
> > chain.
> >
> > rxe_qp_do_cleanup -> rxe_completer -> drain_resp_pkts ->
> > skb_dequeue(&qp->resp_pkts)
> >
> > But I might misunderstood it ...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Guoqing
