> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:04 AM
> To: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-hyperv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Dexuan Cui
> <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Paul Rosswurm
> <paulros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; olaf@xxxxxxxxx; vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx;
> davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx;
> kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; Long Li <longli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> ssengar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx; bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> ast@xxxxxxxxxx; Ajay Sharma <sharmaajay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> hawk@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3,net-next, 2/4] net: mana: Refactor RX buffer allocation
> code to prepare for various MTU
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 02:16:01PM -0700, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
> > Move out common buffer allocation code from mana_process_rx_cqe() and
> > mana_alloc_rx_wqe() to helper functions.
> > Refactor related variables so they can be changed in one place, and buffer
> > sizes are in sync.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > V3:
> > Refectored to multiple patches for readability. Suggested by Jacob Keller.
> >
> > V2:
> > Refectored to multiple patches for readability. Suggested by Yunsheng Lin.
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c | 154 ++++++++++-------
> -
> > include/net/mana/mana.h | 6 +-
> > 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>
> <...>
>
> > +static void *mana_get_rxfrag(struct mana_rxq *rxq, struct device *dev,
> > + dma_addr_t *da, bool is_napi)
> > +{
> > + struct page *page;
> > + void *va;
> > +
> > + /* Reuse XDP dropped page if available */
> > + if (rxq->xdp_save_va) {
> > + va = rxq->xdp_save_va;
> > + rxq->xdp_save_va = NULL;
> > + } else {
> > + page = dev_alloc_page();
>
> Documentation/networking/page_pool.rst
> 10 Basic use involves replacing alloc_pages() calls with the
> 11 page_pool_alloc_pages() call. Drivers should use
> page_pool_dev_alloc_pages()
> 12 replacing dev_alloc_pages().
>
> General question, is this sentence applicable to all new code or only
> for XDP related paths?
Quote from the context before that sentence --
=============
Page Pool API
=============
The page_pool allocator is optimized for the XDP mode that uses one frame
per-page, but it can fallback on the regular page allocator APIs.
Basic use involves replacing alloc_pages() calls with the
page_pool_alloc_pages() call. Drivers should use page_pool_dev_alloc_pages()
replacing dev_alloc_pages().
--unquote
So the page pool is optimized for the XDP, and that sentence is applicable to drivers
that have set up page pool for XDP optimization.
static inline struct page *page_pool_dev_alloc_pages(struct page_pool *pool) //need a pool been set up
Back to our mana driver, we don't have page pool setup yet. (will consider in the future)
So we cannot call page_pool_dev_alloc_pages(pool) in this place yet.
Thanks,
- Haiyang
