Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] IB/qib: don't use qib_wc_x86_64 for UML

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] IB/qib: don't use qib_wc_x86_64 for UML
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 10:28:14 +0100 (CET)
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jeff Dike <jdike@xxxxxxxxxxx>, anton ivanov <anton.ivanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-um <linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Y4hyPPzyQiI3i9jh@unreal>
References: <20221130200945.24459-1-rdunlap@infradead.org> <Y4hyPPzyQiI3i9jh@unreal>

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> I would advocate to add this line to whole drivers/infiniband.
> None of RDMA code makes sense for UML.

Yes. Makes sense.

Thanks,
//richard

References:
- [PATCH 1/2 v2] IB/qib: don't use qib_wc_x86_64 for UML
  - From: Randy Dunlap
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] IB/qib: don't use qib_wc_x86_64 for UML
  - From: Leon Romanovsky

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] IB/rdmavt: don't use rdmavt for UML
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] IB/qib: don't use qib_wc_x86_64 for UML
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] IB/qib: don't use qib_wc_x86_64 for UML
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] IB/qib: don't use qib_wc_x86_64 for UML
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux