Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] sched, net: NUMA-aware CPU spreading interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/3/2022 4:56 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 17:49:56 +0100 Valentin Schneider wrote:
Tariq pointed out in [1] that drivers allocating IRQ vectors would benefit
from having smarter NUMA-awareness (cpumask_local_spread() doesn't quite cut
it).

The proposed interface involved an array of CPUs and a temporary cpumask, and
being my difficult self what I'm proposing here is an interface that doesn't
require any temporary storage other than some stack variables (at the cost of
one wild macro).

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220728191203.4055-1-tariqt@xxxxxxxxxx/

Not sure who's expected to take these, no preference here so:

Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for ironing it out!

Thanks Jakub.

Valentin, what do you think?
Shouldn't it go through the sched branch?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux