Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] sched/topology: Introduce for_each_numa_hop_mask()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21/10/22 16:34, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 04:16:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 01:19:26PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> > +#define for_each_numa_hop_mask(mask, node)				     \
>> > +	for (unsigned int __hops = 0;					     \
>> > +	     /*								     \
>> > +	      * Unsightly trickery required as we can't both initialize	     \
>> > +	      * @mask and declare __hops in for()'s first clause	     \
>> > +	      */							     \
>> > +	     mask = __hops > 0 ? mask :					     \
>> > +		    node == NUMA_NO_NODE ?				     \
>> > +		    cpu_online_mask : sched_numa_hop_mask(node, 0),	     \
>> > +	     !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mask);					     \
>>
>> > +	     __hops++,							     \
>> > +	     mask = sched_numa_hop_mask(node, __hops))
>>
>> This can be unified with conditional, see for_each_gpio_desc_with_flag() as
>> example how.
>
> Something like
>
>       mask = (__hops || node != NUMA_NO_NODE) ? sched_numa_hop_mask(node, __hops) : cpu_online_mask
>

That does simplify things somewhat, thanks!

> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux