OK! Thank you very much. On 2022/9/27 1:35, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Please no, at LPC it seems the general consensus is that the devm > varients were a Bad Idea. If the code as-is is correct then lets leave > it alone.
OK! Thank you very much. On 2022/9/27 1:35, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Please no, at LPC it seems the general consensus is that the devm > varients were a Bad Idea. If the code as-is is correct then lets leave > it alone.