On 2022/8/31 10:47, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 8/30/22 18:47, yangx.jy@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
>> b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
>> index 7720ea270ed8..528cdd0daba4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
>> @@ -1961,6 +1961,7 @@ static void srp_process_rsp(struct srp_rdma_ch
>> *ch, struct srp_rsp *rsp)
>> if (scmnd) {
>> req = scsi_cmd_priv(scmnd);
>> scmnd = srp_claim_req(ch, req, NULL, scmnd);
>> + scmnd->result = rsp->status;
>> } else {
>> shost_printk(KERN_ERR, target->scsi_host,
>> "Null scmnd for RSP w/tag %#016llx received on
>> ch %td / QP %#x\n",
>> @@ -1972,7 +1973,6 @@ static void srp_process_rsp(struct srp_rdma_ch
>> *ch, struct srp_rsp *rsp)
>> return;
>> }
>> - scmnd->result = rsp->status;
>> if (rsp->flags & SRP_RSP_FLAG_SNSVALID) {
>> memcpy(scmnd->sense_buffer, rsp->data +
>
> Since there is a 'return' statement in the else branch, I don't see how
> this patch can make a difference?
Hi Bart,
Sorry, I didn't make the right fix. I will send v2 patch.
I think scmnd may be set to NULL after srp_claim_req() is called and
then setting scmnd->result can trigger the NULL pointer dereference.
Best Regards,
Xiao Yang
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
