On 25/08/22 14:05, Yury Norov wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 07:12:04PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote: >> In preparation of introducing for_each_cpu_andnot(), add a variant of >> find_next_bit() that negate the bits in @addr2 when ANDing them with the >> bits in @addr1. >> >> Note that the _find_next_bit() @invert argument now gets split into two: >> @invert1 for words in @addr1, @invert2 for words in @addr2. The only >> current users of _find_next_bit() with @invert set are: >> o find_next_zero_bit() >> o find_next_zero_bit_le() >> and neither of these pass an @addr2, so the conversion is straightforward. >> >> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Have you seen this series? > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YwaXvphVpy5A7fSs@yury-laptop/t/ > > It will significantly simplify your work for adding the > find_next_andnot_bit(). If you wait a week or so, you'll most likely > find it in -next. > I hadn't seen it, it does look promising. I'm about to disappear for a week, so I'll have a look once I'm back. > Thanks, > Yury
