On 6/27/22 11:37 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 6/27/22 00:09, lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> So far, I doubt if the previous defect of configfs mentioned in >> 9b64f7d0b: "(RDMA/srpt: Postpone HCA removal until after configfs >> directory removal)" has got a better solution. if not, i have no a >> clear mechanism to avoid it yet. >> >> feedbacks are very welcome. > Mike, are you perhaps aware of any plans to add functions to the LIO core for removing tpg and wwn objects? > I don't know any work being done in this area. I was only working on the refcounting/configfs parts for sessions in those configfs/sysfs patchsets. However, I think I hit similar issues with the session. I went around the world with solutions but didn't really like them so I never pushed the patches for inclusion. What was the hang caused by 9b64f7d0bb0a?
