On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 01:11:25PM -0700, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > On 30 May 14:40, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > You can use [PATCH net-mlx5] for fixes and [PATCH net-next-mlx5] for > none-critical commits. > Realistically, there is no way I'm going to remember that and there isn't an automated way to look it up. I try really hard to get the net tree stuff correct so when netdev is on the CC list. But putting the correct net tree in the subject line is quite a huge headache and I quite often get it wrong. > > Smatch complains about this function: > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c:2000 mlx5_esw_unlock() > > warn: inconsistent returns '&esw->mode_lock'. > > > > Before commit ec2fa47d7b98 ("net/mlx5: Lag, use lag lock") there > > used to be a matching mlx5_esw_lock() function and the lock and > > unlock functions were symmetric. But now we take the long > ^ lock ? Heh. Thanks. regards, dan carpenter