Re: Possible bug in ipoib_reap_dead_ahs in datagram mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 03:18:53PM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
> I believe that if we never enter that if statement, then we will leak
> the entries that are supposed to be cleaned up.  That's better than
> the use-after-free that I feared but still not good.

I don't know, we are running enhanced IPoIB all the time and I never got
any reports about kmemleaks/KASAN in that area.

Thanks

> 
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 3:08 PM Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 09:33:52AM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 3:07 AM Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > IPoIB in mlx5 is HW offloaded version of ulp/ipoib one. AFAIK, it doesn't
> > > > change "tx_tail" and we won't enter into this if (...).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > >
> > > I don't quite follow this response.  Is this the if statement that you
> > > mean that we won't fall into?
> > >
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c#n682
> >
> > Yes, I think so, maybe wrong here.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux