On 2022/05/03 18:02, Paolo Abeni wrote: > This looks equivalent to the fix presented here: Not equivalent. > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CANn89i+484ffqb93aQm1N-tjxxvb3WDKX0EbD7318RwRgsatjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > but the latter looks a more generic solution. @Tetsuo could you please > test the above in your setup? I already tested that fix, and the result was https://lore.kernel.org/all/78cdbf25-4511-a567-bb09-0c07edae8b50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ .
