On Sun, 27 Mar 2022 19:38:31 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 03:35:42PM +0800, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
> > The bug is here:
> > if (!pdev) {
> >
> > The list iterator value 'pdev' will *always* be set and non-NULL
> > by for_each_netdev(), so it is incorrect to assume that the
> > iterator value will be NULL if the list is empty or no element
> > found (in this case, the check 'if (!pdev)' can be bypassed as
> > it always be false unexpectly).
> >
> > To fix the bug, use a new variable 'iter' as the list iterator,
> > while use the original variable 'pdev' as a dedicated pointer to
> > point to the found element.
>
> I don't think that the description is correct.
> We are talking about loopback interface which received packet, the pdev will always exist.
Do the both conditions impossible?
1. the list is empty or
2. we can not found a pdev due to this check
if (ipv6_chk_addr(&init_net,
(struct in6_addr *)peer_ip,
pdev, 1))
iter, 1))
> Most likely. the check of "if (!pdev)" is to catch impossible situation where IPV6 packet
> was sent over loopback, but IPV6 is not enabled.
--
Xiaomeng Tong
