Re: [PATCH for-next 5/8] RDMA/hns: Refactor mailbox functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2022/2/24 21:30, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>  #define CMD_POLL_TOKEN 0xffff
>>  #define CMD_MAX_NUM 32
>>  
>> -static int hns_roce_cmd_mbox_post_hw(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, u64 in_param,
>> -				     u64 out_param, u32 in_modifier, u8 op,
>> -				     u16 token, int event)
>> +static int hns_roce_cmd_mbox_post_hw(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
>> +				     struct hns_roce_mbox_msg *mbox_msg)
>>  {
>> -	return hr_dev->hw->post_mbox(hr_dev, in_param, out_param, in_modifier,
>> -				     op, token, event);
>> +	return hr_dev->hw->post_mbox(hr_dev, mbox_msg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void hns_roce_set_basic_mbox_msg(struct hns_roce_mbox_msg *mbox_msg,
>> +					u64 in_param, u64 out_param, u8 cmd,
>> +					unsigned long tag)
>> +{
>> +	mbox_msg->in_param = in_param;
>> +	mbox_msg->out_param = out_param;
>> +	mbox_msg->cmd = cmd;
>> +	mbox_msg->tag = tag;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void hns_roce_set_poll_mbox_msg(struct hns_roce_mbox_msg *mbox_msg)
>> +{
>> +	mbox_msg->event_en = 0;
>> +	mbox_msg->token = CMD_POLL_TOKEN;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void hns_roce_set_event_mbox_msg(struct hns_roce_mbox_msg *mbox_msg,
>> +					struct hns_roce_cmd_context *context)
>> +{
>> +	mbox_msg->event_en = 1;
>> +	mbox_msg->token = context->token;
>>  }
> I don't see too much value in three functions above. They are called exactly once.
> 
> Thanks
> .
> 

Yes, these assignment statements should not constitute a standalone function.
Fix it in v2.

Thanks,
Wenpeng



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux