> On Feb 17, 2022, at 3:02 PM, Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:01 PM Junji Wei <weijunji@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >>> On Feb 16, 2022, at 3:26 PM, Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 03:13:11PM +0800, Junji Wei wrote: >>>> >>> >>> <...> >>> >>>>>> We can't. So do you mean we can implement virtio-rdma only for IB in the future? >>>>> >>>>> It's probably virtio-IB but we need to listen to others. >>>> >>>> Agreed, one problem is that there might be some duplicated works. >>> >>> Once it will be needed, the code can be refactored. IB and RoCE are >>> different from user perspective, so combining them into one virtio-rdma >>> module doesn't give too much advantage. >> >> Yes, code would be fine. But there maybe some duplicated contents in spec. > > We can carefully design the interfaces in order to eliminate the > duplication in the spec. Ok, we will try to extend virtio-net spec in v2. Thanks.
