Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [RFC] Virtio RDMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 8:06 PM Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 06:03:29PM +0800, Junji Wei wrote:
> >
> > > On Feb 16, 2022, at 5:48 PM, Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 04:00:53PM +0800, Junji Wei wrote:
> > >
> > > <...>
> > >
> > >>>
> > >>> What is the use case for this virtio-rdma? Especially in context of RXE.
> > >>
> > >> Hmm... yes, we didn’t find one. In passthrough case we can use RXE directly.
> > >
> > > It doesn't sound like a good sales pitch.
> >
> > Maybe I misunderstanded what you mean. We mean we didn’t find a user case
> > for virtio-rdma with passthrough net device. Do you want to know the user
> > case for our virtio-rdma(RoCE) proposal?
>
> Yes, please.
>

I think one point is: when running RDMA accelerated applications in
VM, the virtio-rdma solution should get better performance than RXE
since it has a shorter data path (guest app -> host dpdk, bypass guest
kernel).

Thanks,
Yongji




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux