On 31/12/2021 22:40, Tom Talpey wrote:
> On 12/30/2021 10:34 PM, lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>>>> +static bool ib_check_flush_access_flags(struct ib_mr *mr, u32 flags)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return mr->is_pmem || !(flags & IB_ACCESS_FLUSH_PERSISTENT);
>>>> +}
>
>>> Its name is confusing and needs to be clarified.
>>
>> Err, let me see.... a more suitable name is very welcome.
>
> Since the subroutine is rather simple, and with only a single
> reference in a single file, it would be best to just pull
> the test inline and delete it. This would also remove some
> inefficient code.
>
> if (flags & IB_ACCESS_FLUSH_PERSISTENT) {
> if (!iova_in_pmem(mr, iova, length) {
> pr_err("Cannot set IB_ACCESS_FLUSH_PERSISTENT for non-pmem memory\n");
> mr->state = RXE_MR_STATE_INVALID;
> mr->umem = NULL;
> err = -EINVAL;
> goto err_release_umem;
> }
> mr-> ibmr.is_pmem = true;
> }
> ...
Make sense.
Thanks
Zhijian
