On 11/30/21 7:03 PM, Jinpu Wang wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:40 AM Christoph Lameter<cl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
int cpu;
cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
- s = this_cpu_ptr(stats->pcpu_stats);
+ s = get_cpu_ptr(stats->pcpu_stats);
if (con->cpu != cpu) {
s->cpu_migr.to++;
@@ -27,14 +27,16 @@ void rtrs_clt_update_wc_stats(struct rtrs_clt_con *con)
s = per_cpu_ptr(stats->pcpu_stats, con->cpu);
atomic_inc(&s->cpu_migr.from);
}
+ put_cpu_ptr(stats->pcpu_stats);
}
void rtrs_clt_inc_failover_cnt(struct rtrs_clt_stats *stats)
{
struct rtrs_clt_stats_pcpu *s;
- s = this_cpu_ptr(stats->pcpu_stats);
+ s = get_cpu_ptr(stats->pcpu_stats);
s->rdma.failover_cnt++;
+ put_cpu_ptr(stats->pcpu_stats);
This is equivalent to
this_cpu_inc(stats->pcpu_stats.rdma.failover_cnt);
Which will also reduce the segment to a single cpu instruction.
Thanks for your suggestion, Christoph.
Good suggestion!
As the patch is already applied, I will send a new patch as suggested.
Thanks for it.
Cheers,
Guoqing