On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 03:58:00PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 09:55:15 +0300 > Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > +void *devlink_priv(struct devlink *devlink) > > +{ > > + BUG_ON(!devlink); > > Do we really want to bring down the kernel in this case? It was before. > > Can't we just have: > > if (WARN_ON(!devlink)) > return NULL; > ? Callers of devlink_priv() are not prepared to have NULL here, they don't check return value at all,and this BUG_ON() can't happen at all. > > Same for the below as well. I can send followup patch. Thanks > > -- Steve > > > + return &devlink->priv; > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_priv); > > + > > +struct devlink *priv_to_devlink(void *priv) > > +{ > > + BUG_ON(!priv); > > + return container_of(priv, struct devlink, priv); > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(priv_to_devlink); > > + > > +struct device *devlink_to_dev(const struct devlink *devlink) > > +{ > > + return devlink->dev; > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_to_dev); > > +