On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 03:07:14PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:02:29AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > +static int stat_get_doit_default_counter(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > + struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
> > + struct nlattr *tb[])
> > +{
> > + struct rdma_hw_stats *stats;
> > + struct ib_device *device;
> > + u32 index, port;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!tb[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_DEV_INDEX] || !tb[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_PORT_INDEX])
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + index = nla_get_u32(tb[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_DEV_INDEX]);
> > + device = ib_device_get_by_index(sock_net(skb->sk), index);
> > + if (!device)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + port = nla_get_u32(tb[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_PORT_INDEX]);
> > + if (!rdma_is_port_valid(device, port)) {
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + goto end;
> > + }
> > +
> > + stats = ib_get_hw_stats_port(device, port);
> > + if (!stats) {
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + goto end;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (tb[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_STAT_HWCOUNTER_DYNAMIC])
> > + ret = stat_get_doit_stats_list(skb, nlh, extack, tb,
> > + device, port, stats);
> > + else
> > + ret = stat_get_doit_stats_values(skb, nlh, extack, tb, device,
> > + port, stats);
>
> And this is still here - 'gets' do not act differently depending on
> inputs..
This patch shouldn't be sent at all. Sorry for the noise.
Thanks
>
> Jason
