Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] Providers/rxe: Add dma-buf support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 2:20 PM Shunsuke Mie <mie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Implement a new provider method for dma-buf base memory registration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shunsuke Mie <mie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  providers/rxe/rxe.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/providers/rxe/rxe.c b/providers/rxe/rxe.c
> index 3c3ea8bb..84e00e60 100644
> --- a/providers/rxe/rxe.c
> +++ b/providers/rxe/rxe.c
> @@ -239,6 +239,26 @@ static struct ibv_mr *rxe_reg_mr(struct ibv_pd *pd, void *addr, size_t length,
>         return &vmr->ibv_mr;
>  }
>
> +static struct ibv_mr *rxe_reg_dmabuf_mr(struct ibv_pd *pd, uint64_t offset,
> +                                       size_t length, uint64_t iova, int fd,
> +                                       int access)
> +{
> +       struct verbs_mr *vmr;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       vmr = malloc(sizeof(*vmr));
> +       if (!vmr)
> +               return NULL;
> +

Do we need to set vmr to zero like the following?

memset(vmr, 0, sizeof(*vmr));

Zhu Yanjun

> +       ret = ibv_cmd_reg_dmabuf_mr(pd, offset, length, iova, fd, access, vmr);
> +       if (ret) {
> +               free(vmr);
> +               return NULL;
> +       }
> +
> +       return &vmr->ibv_mr;
> +}
> +
>  static int rxe_dereg_mr(struct verbs_mr *vmr)
>  {
>         int ret;
> @@ -1706,6 +1726,7 @@ static const struct verbs_context_ops rxe_ctx_ops = {
>         .alloc_pd = rxe_alloc_pd,
>         .dealloc_pd = rxe_dealloc_pd,
>         .reg_mr = rxe_reg_mr,
> +       .reg_dmabuf_mr = rxe_reg_dmabuf_mr,
>         .dereg_mr = rxe_dereg_mr,
>         .alloc_mw = rxe_alloc_mw,
>         .dealloc_mw = rxe_dealloc_mw,
> --
> 2.17.1
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux