[PATCH rdma-rc] RDMA/usnic: Lock VF with mutex instead of spinlock

[Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxx>

Usnic VF doesn't need lock in atomic context to create QPs, so it is safe
to use mutex instead of spinlock. Such change fixes the following smatch
error.

Smatch static checker warning:

   lib/kobject.c:289 kobject_set_name_vargs()
    warn: sleeping in atomic context

Fixes: 514aee660df4 ("RDMA: Globally allocate and release QP memory")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_ib.h       |  2 +-
 drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_ib_main.c  |  2 +-
 drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_ib_verbs.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_ib.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_ib.h
index 84dd682d2334..b350081aeb5a 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_ib.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_ib.h
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ struct usnic_ib_dev {
 
 struct usnic_ib_vf {
 	struct usnic_ib_dev		*pf;
-	spinlock_t			lock;
+	struct mutex			lock;
 	struct usnic_vnic		*vnic;
 	unsigned int			qp_grp_ref_cnt;
 	struct usnic_ib_pd		*pd;
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_ib_main.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_ib_main.c
index 228e9a36dad0..d346dd48e731 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_ib_main.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_ib_main.c
@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ static int usnic_ib_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 	}
 
 	vf->pf = pf;
-	spin_lock_init(&vf->lock);
+	mutex_init(&vf->lock);
 	mutex_lock(&pf->usdev_lock);
 	list_add_tail(&vf->link, &pf->vf_dev_list);
 	/*
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_ib_verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_ib_verbs.c
index 06a4e9d4545d..756a83bcff58 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_ib_verbs.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_ib_verbs.c
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ find_free_vf_and_create_qp_grp(struct ib_qp *qp,
 		for (i = 0; dev_list[i]; i++) {
 			dev = dev_list[i];
 			vf = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-			spin_lock(&vf->lock);
+			mutex_lock(&vf->lock);
 			vnic = vf->vnic;
 			if (!usnic_vnic_check_room(vnic, res_spec)) {
 				usnic_dbg("Found used vnic %s from %s\n",
@@ -208,10 +208,10 @@ find_free_vf_and_create_qp_grp(struct ib_qp *qp,
 							     vf, pd, res_spec,
 							     trans_spec);
 
-				spin_unlock(&vf->lock);
+				mutex_unlock(&vf->lock);
 				goto qp_grp_check;
 			}
-			spin_unlock(&vf->lock);
+			mutex_unlock(&vf->lock);
 
 		}
 		usnic_uiom_free_dev_list(dev_list);
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ find_free_vf_and_create_qp_grp(struct ib_qp *qp,
 
 	/* Try to find resources on an unused vf */
 	list_for_each_entry(vf, &us_ibdev->vf_dev_list, link) {
-		spin_lock(&vf->lock);
+		mutex_lock(&vf->lock);
 		vnic = vf->vnic;
 		if (vf->qp_grp_ref_cnt == 0 &&
 		    usnic_vnic_check_room(vnic, res_spec) == 0) {
@@ -228,10 +228,10 @@ find_free_vf_and_create_qp_grp(struct ib_qp *qp,
 						     vf, pd, res_spec,
 						     trans_spec);
 
-			spin_unlock(&vf->lock);
+			mutex_unlock(&vf->lock);
 			goto qp_grp_check;
 		}
-		spin_unlock(&vf->lock);
+		mutex_unlock(&vf->lock);
 	}
 
 	usnic_info("No free qp grp found on %s\n",
@@ -253,9 +253,9 @@ static void qp_grp_destroy(struct usnic_ib_qp_grp *qp_grp)
 
 	WARN_ON(qp_grp->state != IB_QPS_RESET);
 
-	spin_lock(&vf->lock);
+	mutex_lock(&vf->lock);
 	usnic_ib_qp_grp_destroy(qp_grp);
-	spin_unlock(&vf->lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&vf->lock);
 }
 
 static int create_qp_validate_user_data(struct usnic_ib_create_qp_cmd cmd)
-- 
2.31.1