On 8/26/21 2:03 PM, Bob Pearson wrote:
> On 8/25/21 11:32 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 11:02:14AM +0800, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 11:02 AM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Bob,
>>>>
>>>> If I run the following test against Linus' master branch then that test
>>>> passes (commit d5ae8d7f85b7 ("Revert "media: dvb header files: move some
>>>> headers to staging"")):
>>>>
>>>> # export use_siw=1 && modprobe brd && (cd blktests && ./check -q srp/002)
>>>> srp/002 (File I/O on top of multipath concurrently with logout and login (mq)) [passed]
>>>> runtime ... 48.849s
>>>>
>>>> The following test fails:
>>>>
>>>> # export use_siw= && modprobe brd && (cd blktests && ./check -q srp/002)
>>>> srp/002 (File I/O on top of multipath concurrently with logout and login (mq)) [failed]
>>>> runtime 48.849s ... 15.024s
>>>> +++ /home/bart/software/blktests/results/nodev/srp/002.out.bad 2021-08-23 19:51:05.182958728 -0700
>>>> @@ -1,2 +1 @@
>>>> Configured SRP target driver
>>>> -Passed
>>>
>>> Can this commit "RDMA/rxe: Zero out index member of struct rxe_queue"
>>> in the link https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git/commit/?h=wip/jgg-for-rc
>>> fix this problem?
>>>
>>> And the commit will be merged into linux upstream very soon.
>>
>> Please let me know Bart, if the rxe driver is still broken I will
>> definitely punt all the changes for RXE to the next cycle until it can
>> be fixed.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>
> Jason, Bart, Zhu
>
> I have succeeded in getting blktest to pass on 5.14. There is a bug in rxe that I had to fix. In
> loopback mode when an RNR NAK is received it requests the requester to start a retry sequence
> before the rnr timer fires which results in the command being retried immediately regardless of the
> value of the timeout. I made a small change which requires the requester to wait for either the
> timer to fire or an ack to arrive. The srp/002 test case in blktest spends a long time before posting
> a receive in some cases which caused a soft lockup. There is a second non-bug which is the number of
> MRs was too small to run the test. I increased these by a factor of 256 which fixed that.
>
> My test setup has for-next + 5 recent rxe fix patches applied in addition to the RNR timing one above.
>
> I will submit a patch for the rnr fix.
>
> Bob
>
Well it's better but not quite done yet.
