Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum values used via uverbs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 7:53 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Zhu,
>
> Any update on your testing after applying Bob's fixes

Do you read my problem carefully?
I mean that before your commit, the whole rxe can work well.
After your commit, the rxe can not work well.
Please reproduce this problem in your host and fix it.

Zhu Yanjun

>
> Shoaib
>
> On 7/29/21 5:34 PM, Shoaib Rao wrote:
> > Thanks Bob.
> >
> > Zhu can you please apply those patches and test.
> >
> > Shoaib
> >
> > On 7/29/21 4:08 PM, Pearson, Robert B wrote:
> >> I found another rxe bug (for SRQ) and sent three bug fixes in a set
> >> including the one you mention. They should all be applied.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 2:51 PM
> >> To: Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@xxxxxxxxx>; RDMA mailing list
> >> <linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum values
> >> used via uverbs
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 12:33:14PM -0700, Shoaib Rao wrote:
> >>
> >>> Can we please accept my initial patch where I bumped up the values of
> >>> a few parameters. We have extensively tested with those values. I will
> >>> try to resolve CRC errors and panic and make changes to other
> >>> tuneables later?
> >> I think Bob posted something for the icrc issues already
> >>
> >> Please try to work in a sane fashion, rxe shouldn't be left broken
> >> with so many people apparently interested in it??
> >>
> >> Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux