On 7/26/2021 10:46 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
/**
* svc_rdma_wc_send - Invoked by RDMA provider for each polled Send WC
* @cq: Completion Queue context
@@ -275,11 +289,9 @@ static void svc_rdma_wc_send(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
trace_svcrdma_wc_send(wc, &ctxt->sc_cid);
+ svc_rdma_wake_send_waiters(rdma, 1);
complete(&ctxt->sc_done);
- atomic_inc(&rdma->sc_sq_avail);
- wake_up(&rdma->sc_send_wait);
This appears to change the order of wake_up() vs complete().
Is that intentional? Is there any possibility of a false
scheduler activation, later leading to a second wakeup or poll?
Tom.