Re: [PATCH for-next] RDMA/rxe: Fix memory leak in error path code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 4:16 PM Haakon Bugge <haakon.bugge@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 5 Jul 2021, at 05:42, Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 6:37 AM Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> In rxe_mr_init_user() in rxe_mr.c at the third error the driver fails to
> >> free the memory at mr->map. This patch adds code to do that.
> >> This error only occurs if page_address() fails to return a non zero address
> >> which should never happen for 64 bit architectures.
> >
> > If this will never happen for 64 bit architectures, is it possible to
> > exclude 64 bit architecture with some MACROs or others?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Zhu Yanjun
> >
> >>
> >> Fixes: 8700e3e7c485 ("Soft RoCE driver")
> >> Reported by: Haakon Bugge <haakon.bugge@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++-------------
> >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c
> >> index 6aabcb4de235..f49baff9ca3d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c
> >> @@ -106,20 +106,21 @@ void rxe_mr_init_dma(struct rxe_pd *pd, int access, struct rxe_mr *mr)
> >> int rxe_mr_init_user(struct rxe_pd *pd, u64 start, u64 length, u64 iova,
> >>                     int access, struct rxe_mr *mr)
> >> {
> >> -       struct rxe_map          **map;
> >> -       struct rxe_phys_buf     *buf = NULL;
> >> -       struct ib_umem          *umem;
> >> -       struct sg_page_iter     sg_iter;
> >> -       int                     num_buf;
> >> -       void                    *vaddr;
> >> +       struct rxe_map **map;
> >> +       struct rxe_phys_buf *buf = NULL;
> >> +       struct ib_umem *umem;
> >> +       struct sg_page_iter sg_iter;
> >> +       int num_buf;
> >> +       void *vaddr;
>
> This white-space stripping must be another issue, not related to the memleak?
>
> >>        int err;
> >> +       int i;
> >>
> >>        umem = ib_umem_get(pd->ibpd.device, start, length, access);
> >>        if (IS_ERR(umem)) {
> >> -               pr_warn("err %d from rxe_umem_get\n",
> >> -                       (int)PTR_ERR(umem));
> >> +               pr_warn("%s: Unable to pin memory region err = %d\n",
> >> +                       __func__, (int)PTR_ERR(umem));
> >>                err = PTR_ERR(umem);
> >> -               goto err1;
> >> +               goto err_out;
> >>        }
> >>
> >>        mr->umem = umem;
> >> @@ -129,15 +130,15 @@ int rxe_mr_init_user(struct rxe_pd *pd, u64 start, u64 length, u64 iova,
> >>
> >>        err = rxe_mr_alloc(mr, num_buf);
> >>        if (err) {
> >> -               pr_warn("err %d from rxe_mr_alloc\n", err);
> >> -               ib_umem_release(umem);
> >> -               goto err1;
> >> +               pr_warn("%s: Unable to allocate memory for map\n",
> >> +                               __func__);
> >> +               goto err_release_umem;
> >>        }
> >>
> >>        mr->page_shift = PAGE_SHIFT;
> >>        mr->page_mask = PAGE_SIZE - 1;
> >>
> >> -       num_buf                 = 0;
> >> +       num_buf = 0;
>
> White-space change.

Yeah. It seems that some white-space changes in this commit.

Zhu Yanjun

>
> Otherwise:
>
> Reviewed-by: Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Thxs, Håkon
>
>
>
> >>        map = mr->map;
> >>        if (length > 0) {
> >>                buf = map[0]->buf;
> >> @@ -151,10 +152,10 @@ int rxe_mr_init_user(struct rxe_pd *pd, u64 start, u64 length, u64 iova,
> >>
> >>                        vaddr = page_address(sg_page_iter_page(&sg_iter));
> >>                        if (!vaddr) {
> >> -                               pr_warn("null vaddr\n");
> >> -                               ib_umem_release(umem);
> >> +                               pr_warn("%s: Unable to get virtual address\n",
> >> +                                               __func__);
> >>                                err = -ENOMEM;
> >> -                               goto err1;
> >> +                               goto err_cleanup_map;
> >>                        }
> >>
> >>                        buf->addr = (uintptr_t)vaddr;
> >> @@ -177,7 +178,13 @@ int rxe_mr_init_user(struct rxe_pd *pd, u64 start, u64 length, u64 iova,
> >>
> >>        return 0;
> >>
> >> -err1:
> >> +err_cleanup_map:
> >> +       for (i = 0; i < mr->num_map; i++)
> >> +               kfree(mr->map[i]);
> >> +       kfree(mr->map);
> >> +err_release_umem:
> >> +       ib_umem_release(umem);
> >> +err_out:
> >>        return err;
> >> }
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.30.2
> >>
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux