On 6/18/21 4:25 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 01:58:48PM -0500, Bob Pearson wrote:
On 6/18/21 11:33 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 10:56:58PM -0500, Bob Pearson wrote:
It isn't my call. But I am in favor of tunable parameters. -- Bob Pearson
Can we just delete the concept completely?
Jason
Not sure where you are headed here. Do you mean just lift the limits
all together?
Yes.. The spec doesn't have like a UCONTEXT limit for instance, and
real HW like mlx5 has huge reported limits anyhow.
These limits are reported via uverbs, so what do we report without
current applications. Creating pool also requires limits but I guess we
can use something like -1 to indicate there is no limit. I would have to
look at all the values to see if we can implement this.
Shoaib
Jason
