Re: [PATCH for-next] RDMA/cma: Fix incorrect Packet Lifetime calculation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On 22 Jun 2021, at 10:18, Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 03:18:57PM +0200, Håkon Bugge wrote:
>> An approximation for the PacketLifeTime is half the local ACK timeout.
>> The encoding for both timers are logarithmic. The PacketLifeTime
>> calculation is wrong when local ACK timeout is zero. In that case,
>> PacketLifeTime is set to the incorrect value 255.
>> 
>> Fixed by explicitly testing for timeout being zero.
>> 
>> Fixes: e1ee1e62bec4 ("RDMA/cma: Use ACK timeout for RoCE packetLifeTime")
>> Signed-off-by: Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> ---
>> 
>> 	* Note: This commit must be merged after ("RDMA/cma: Replace
>>          RMW with atomic bit-ops")
>> ---
>> drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c | 8 +++++---
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for the review, Leon! I have to rebase on the tip of for-next, since the ("RDMA/cma: Replace RMW with atomic bit-ops") will not have the get_bit() stuff in cma_resolve_iboe_route() anymore. I assume I can retain your r-b after the rebase?


Thxs, Håkon








[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux