On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 12:09:13PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > 1) qp_access_flags as a bitmask of possible operations on the queue pair > The way I understood the queue pairs this should really be just bits > for remote read, remote write and atomics, but a few places also > mess with memory windows and local write, which seems to be some > sort of iWarp cludge Honestly I'm not completely sure what the QP access flags are for anymore, will have to go look at some point. > 2) IB_UVERBS_ACCESS_*. These just get checked using ib_check_mr_access > and then passed into ->reg_user_mr, ->rereg_user_mr and > ->reg_user_mr_dmabuf Yes. Using the kernerl flags for those user marked APIs is intended to simplify the drivers as the user/kernel MR logic should have shared elements > 3) in-kernel FRWR uses IB_ACCESS_*, but all users seem to hardcode it > to IB_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE | IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_READ | > IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE anyway So when a ULP is processing a READ it doesn't create a FRWR with read-only rights? Isn't that security wrong? Jason