On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:18:27AM +0200, Gioh Kim wrote:
> From: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> It was difficult to find out why it failed to establish RDMA
> connection. This patch adds some messages to show which function
> has failed why.
>
> Signed-off-by: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-srv.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-srv.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-srv.c
> index 3d09d01e34b4..df17dd4c1e28 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-srv.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-srv.c
> @@ -1356,8 +1356,10 @@ static struct rtrs_srv *get_or_create_srv(struct rtrs_srv_ctx *ctx,
> * If this request is not the first connection request from the
> * client for this session then fail and return error.
> */
> - if (!first_conn)
> + if (!first_conn) {
> + pr_err("Error: Not the first connection request for this session\n");
> return ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
You really shouldn't be printing based on attacker controlled data..
Jason
