> > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 07:15:09PM +0000, Marciniszyn, Mike wrote: > > > > > > > > Why not kzalloc_node() here? > > > > I agree here. > > > > Other allocations that have been promoted to the core have lost the node > attribute in the allocation. > > Did you notice any performance degradation? > For the QP, we most certainly will. In any case, the promotion should address not losing the node. The allocation gets the ib_device, and it would seem to hard to add method of determining the node. Mike
