On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 04:19:03PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 at 11:13, Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:09:06PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 07:09:12PM -0500, Aditya Pakki wrote: > > > > In case of rs failure in rds_send_remove_from_sock(), the 'rm' resource > > > > is freed and later under spinlock, causing potential use-after-free. > > > > Set the free pointer to NULL to avoid undefined behavior. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Aditya Pakki <pakki001@xxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > net/rds/message.c | 1 + > > > > net/rds/send.c | 2 +- > > > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > Dave, Jakub > > > > > > Please revert this patch, given responses from Eric and Al together > > > with this response from Greg here https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YH5/i7OvsjSmqADv@xxxxxxxxx > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YH5%2Fi7OvsjSmqADv@xxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > > > BTW, I looked on the rds code too and agree with Eric, this patch > > > is a total garbage. > > When reverting, consider giving credits to Kees/Coverity as he pointed > out after testing linux-next that this is bogus: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/202104081640.1A09A99900@keescook/ The revert is already done for almost all @umn.edu patches. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210421130105.1226686-1-gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Thanks > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
