Re: [PATCH v2 for-next 0/7] RDMA/core: Correct some coding-style issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021/4/13 2:00, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:15:46PM +0800, Weihang Li wrote:
>> Do some cleanups according to the coding-style of kernel.
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Remove a BUG_ON in #3 and put the changes into a new patch.
>> - Drop the parts about spaces around xx_for_each_xx() from #4 because some
>>   clang formatter prefer current style.
>> - Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/cover/1617697184-48683-1-git-send-email-liweihang@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Let's not make a habit of sending patches like this, but I will take
> this one
>  

Sure.

>> Wenpeng Liang (6):
>>   RDMA/core: Print the function name by __func__ instead of an fixed
>>     string
>>   RDMA/core: Remove the redundant return statements
>>   RDMA/core: Add necessary spaces
>>   RDMA/core: Remove redundant spaces
> 
> I fixed the layout of most of the lines this patch touched as they
> were still not close enough to the canonical format.
> 

OK, thank you.

Weihang

> Applied to for-next, thanks
> 
> Jason
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux