Re: [PATCH for-next] RDMA/core: Flush workqueue before destroy it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 04:34:51PM +0800, Weihang Li wrote:
> From: Yixian Liu <liuyixian@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> It is safer to flush the workqueue before destroying it.

Sorry, safer for what?

destroy_workqueue() flushes workqueue internally. There is no need to do
it twice.

Thanks

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yixian Liu <liuyixian@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Weihang Li <liweihang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
> index 0abce00..e58a06b 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
> @@ -883,6 +883,7 @@ int addr_init(void)
>  void addr_cleanup(void)
>  {
>  	unregister_netevent_notifier(&nb);
> +	flush_workqueue(addr_wq);
>  	destroy_workqueue(addr_wq);
>  	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&req_list));
>  }
> -- 
> 2.8.1
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux