CFI violation in drivers/infiniband/core/sysfs.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

I am testing the Clang Control Flow Integrity series that is being
worked on right now [1] and I encounter a violation in the Infiniband
sysfs core (drivers/infiniband/core/sysfs.c) on an arm64 server with mlx5:

$ cat /sys/class/infiniband/mlx5_bond_0/ports/1/hw_counters/lifespan
12

$ echo "10" | sudo tee /sys/class/infiniband/mlx5_bond_0/ports/1/hw_counters/lifespan
10

$ sudo dmesg
[64198.670342] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[64198.670362] CFI failure (target: show_stats_lifespan+0x0/0x8 [ib_core]):
[64198.671291] WARNING: CPU: 20 PID: 15786 at kernel/cfi.c:29 __ubsan_handle_cfi_check_fail+0x58/0x60
[64198.671336] Modules linked in: binfmt_misc nls_iso8859_1 dm_multipath
scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh_alua ast drm_vram_helper drm_ttm_helper
ttm aes_ce_blk crypto_simd drm_kms_helper cryptd cec rc_core
aes_ce_cipher crct10dif_ce sysimgblt ghash_ce syscopyarea sysfillrect
acpi_ipmi sha2_ce fb_sys_fops ipmi_ssif sha256_arm64 ipmi_devintf
sha1_ce drm efi_pstore sbsa_gwdt tcp_westwood evbug ipmi_msghandler
cppc_cpufreq xgene_hwmon ib_iser rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm iscsi_tcp
libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi bonding ip_tables x_tables
autofs4 raid10 raid456 libcrc32c async_raid6_recov async_pq raid6_pq
async_xor xor xor_neon async_memcpy async_tx raid1 raid0 multipath
linear mlx5_ib ib_uverbs ib_core mlx5_core mlxfw igb i2c_algo_bit tls
i2c_xgene_slimpro ahci_platform gpio_dwapb
[64198.671958] CPU: 20 PID: 15786 Comm: cat Tainted: G        W         5.12.0-rc5+ #5
[64198.671980] Hardware name: Lenovo HR330A            7X33CTO1WW    /HR350A     , BIOS HVE104D-1.02 03/08/2019
[64198.671993] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
[64198.672016] pc : __ubsan_handle_cfi_check_fail+0x58/0x60
[64198.672036] lr : __ubsan_handle_cfi_check_fail+0x58/0x60
[64198.672054] sp : ffff800014ea3b50
[64198.672065] x29: ffff800014ea3b50 x28: ffff80001122da60 
[64198.672095] x27: ffff80001122ad80 x26: ffff800011233088 
[64198.672122] x25: ffff000801821a78 x24: ffff000820cda200 
[64198.672148] x23: ffff800009aa9f60 x22: ffff800009a66000 
[64198.672173] x21: 7dac81f92e1d85cf x20: ffff800009abddd0 
[64198.672198] x19: ffff800009a69fd8 x18: ffffffffffffffff 
[64198.672223] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 
[64198.672250] x15: 0000000000000004 x14: 0000000000001fff 
[64198.672277] x13: ffff8000121412a8 x12: 0000000000000003 
[64198.672303] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000027 
[64198.672329] x9 : 4568e3af67e9f000 x8 : 4568e3af67e9f000 
[64198.672356] x7 : 6e6170736566696c x6 : ffff8000124699c9 
[64198.672381] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000001 
[64198.672406] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 
[64198.672431] x1 : ffff8000119b905d x0 : 000000000000003c 
[64198.672457] Call trace:
[64198.672469]  __ubsan_handle_cfi_check_fail+0x58/0x60
[64198.672489]  __cfi_check_fail+0x3c/0x44 [ib_core]
[64198.673362]  __cfi_check+0x2e78/0x31b0 [ib_core]
[64198.674230]  port_attr_show+0x88/0x98 [ib_core]
[64198.675098]  sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xc4/0x160
[64198.675131]  kernfs_seq_show+0x5c/0xa4
[64198.675157]  seq_read_iter+0x178/0x60c
[64198.675176]  kernfs_fop_read_iter+0x78/0x1fc
[64198.675202]  vfs_read+0x2d0/0x34c
[64198.675220]  ksys_read+0x80/0xec
[64198.675237]  __arm64_sys_read+0x28/0x34
[64198.675253]  el0_svc_common.llvm.13467398108545334879+0xbc/0x1f0
[64198.675277]  do_el0_svc+0x30/0xa4
[64198.675293]  el0_svc+0x30/0xb0
[64198.675314]  el0_sync_handler+0x84/0xe4
[64198.675333]  el0_sync+0x174/0x180
[64198.675351] ---[ end trace a253e31759778f5c ]---
[64216.024673] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[64216.024678] CFI failure (target: set_stats_lifespan+0x0/0x8 [ib_core]):
[64216.024824] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 15816 at kernel/cfi.c:29 __ubsan_handle_cfi_check_fail+0x58/0x60
[64216.024832] Modules linked in: binfmt_misc nls_iso8859_1 dm_multipath
scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh_alua ast drm_vram_helper drm_ttm_helper
ttm aes_ce_blk crypto_simd drm_kms_helper cryptd cec rc_core
aes_ce_cipher crct10dif_ce sysimgblt ghash_ce syscopyarea sysfillrect
acpi_ipmi sha2_ce fb_sys_fops ipmi_ssif sha256_arm64 ipmi_devintf
sha1_ce drm efi_pstore sbsa_gwdt tcp_westwood evbug ipmi_msghandler
cppc_cpufreq xgene_hwmon ib_iser rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm iscsi_tcp
libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi bonding ip_tables x_tables
autofs4 raid10 raid456 libcrc32c async_raid6_recov async_pq raid6_pq
async_xor xor xor_neon async_memcpy async_tx raid1 raid0 multipath
linear mlx5_ib ib_uverbs ib_core mlx5_core mlxfw igb i2c_algo_bit tls
i2c_xgene_slimpro ahci_platform gpio_dwapb
[64216.024922] CPU: 3 PID: 15816 Comm: tee Tainted: G        W         5.12.0-rc5+ #5
[64216.024925] Hardware name: Lenovo HR330A            7X33CTO1WW    /HR350A     , BIOS HVE104D-1.02 03/08/2019
[64216.024927] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
[64216.024931] pc : __ubsan_handle_cfi_check_fail+0x58/0x60
[64216.024933] lr : __ubsan_handle_cfi_check_fail+0x58/0x60
[64216.024936] sp : ffff800015433bf0
[64216.024938] x29: ffff800015433bf0 x28: ffff000808a00000 
[64216.024942] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 
[64216.024945] x25: ffff0008062e5000 x24: ffff000808a00000 
[64216.024949] x23: ffff000825ba9600 x22: ffff800009a66000 
[64216.024952] x21: 6d3b10b5d517da5b x20: ffff800009abddf0 
[64216.024956] x19: ffff800009a69fb8 x18: ffffffffffffffff 
[64216.024959] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 
[64216.024962] x15: 0000000000000004 x14: 0000000000001fff 
[64216.024966] x13: ffff8000121412a8 x12: 0000000000000003 
[64216.024969] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000027 
[64216.024973] x9 : 4568e3af67e9f000 x8 : 4568e3af67e9f000 
[64216.024976] x7 : 2b6e617073656669 x6 : ffff8000124699c8 
[64216.024979] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000001 
[64216.024983] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 
[64216.024986] x1 : ffff8000119b905d x0 : 000000000000003b 
[64216.024990] Call trace:
[64216.024992]  __ubsan_handle_cfi_check_fail+0x58/0x60
[64216.024995]  __cfi_check_fail+0x3c/0x44 [ib_core]
[64216.025133]  __cfi_check+0x2e78/0x31b0 [ib_core]
[64216.025277]  port_attr_store+0x5c/0x90 [ib_core]
[64216.025422]  sysfs_kf_write+0x70/0xd0
[64216.025428]  kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x110/0x1dc
[64216.025431]  vfs_write+0x364/0x46c
[64216.025435]  ksys_write+0x80/0xec
[64216.025437]  __arm64_sys_write+0x28/0x34
[64216.025439]  el0_svc_common.llvm.13467398108545334879+0xbc/0x1f0
[64216.025443]  do_el0_svc+0x30/0xa4
[64216.025445]  el0_svc+0x30/0xb0
[64216.025450]  el0_sync_handler+0x84/0xe4
[64216.025452]  el0_sync+0x174/0x180
[64216.025455] ---[ end trace a253e31759778f5d ]---

According to the call trace, sysfs_kf_seq_show() calls port_attr_show()
because that is the show() member of port_sysfs_ops and port_attr_show()
calls show_stats_lifespan() via an indirect call (port_attr->show()).
The show() member of 'struct port_attribute' is:

ssize_t (*show)(struct ib_port *, struct port_attribute *, char *buf);

but show_stats_lifespan() is defined to be the show() member of
'struct hw_stats_attribute', which is of type

ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf);

so there is a mismatch and the CFI code warns about it. The store
functions have the same issue as you can see above.

I have been trying to work my way through the code in order to suggest a
solution and I am getting lost hence my report. I think the issue is
that the hw_counters folder in sysfs is a 'struct attribute_group',
which gets added underneath the 'struct ib_ports' kobj in add_port(),
meaning that it inherits the sysfs ops from the 'struct ib_ports' kobj,
which are port_attr_{show,store}(). Initially, I though that
'struct hw_stats_attribute' could just be converted over to
'struct port_attribute' but it seems 'struct hw_stats_attribute' does
not have to be used underneath 'struct ib_port', it can be underneath
'struct ib_device', where 'struct port_attribute' is not going to be
relevant. It seems to me that the hw_counters 'struct attribute_group'
should probably be its own kobj within both of these structures so they
can have their own sysfs ops (unless there is some other way to do this
that I am missing).

I would appreciate someone else taking a look and seeing if I am off
base or if there is an easier way to solve this.

If you would like to test locally, you will need clang-12 or newer and
the CFI series. The current series that is currently being reviewed only
supports arm64 but x86_64 is available through Sami's GitHub [2]. If you
do not have easy access to clang-12 through your distribution's package
manager or you don't want to bother with it, I maintain an LLVM build
script [3] that can easily produce a usable one for you entirely self
contained:

# To see the various options available in case you need to use any of them
$ ./build-llvm.py -h

# Build the 12.0.0 branch instead of main
$ ./build-llvm.py --branch "release/12.x"

See the README in the repo for more information on dependencies and
such.

To build with CFI, export the tc-build installation bin folder to your
PATH if you used it, enable some configs (assuming you have an existing working
config), and let it rip:

$ scripts/config \
    -d KASAN \
    -d GCOV_KERNEL \
    -d LTO_NONE \
    -e LTO_CLANG_THIN \
    -e CFI_CLANG \
    -e CFI_PERMISSIVE

$ make -skj"$(nproc)" LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1 olddefconfig all

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@xxxxxxxxxx/
[2]: https://github.com/samitolvanen/linux/commits/clang-cfi
[3]: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/tc-build

Cheers,
Nathan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux