Re: ibv_req_notify_cq clarification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 02:18:31PM +0200, Gal Pressman wrote:
> > Does look like a documentation update is in-order though!
> 
> Looking at libibverbs examples, pyverbs tests and perftest, they all act roughly
> the same:
> 
> 1. arm CQ
> 2. post send/recv
> 3. get event
> 4. arm CQ
> 5. poll
> 6. goto step 2
> 
> All of these apps always use the same construct of get event followed by an
> immediate arm. Did all of these apps get it wrong?

Sean is right, this is OK, so long as step 5 polls to empty, it is
just unwound differently and will take suprious wakeups more often

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux