On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 01:19:09PM -0800, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > On Fri, 2021-02-12 at 17:14 -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 01:09:20PM -0800, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > > > On Fri, 2021-02-12 at 14:10 -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 03:11:05PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > Add an extra timestamp format for mlx5_ib device. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > Aharon Landau (2): > > > > > net/mlx5: Add new timestamp mode bits > > > > > RDMA/mlx5: Fail QP creation if the device can not support the > > > > > CQE > > > > > TS > > > > > > > > > > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/qp.c | 104 > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > > > > include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h | 54 +++++++++++++++-- > > > > > 2 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > Since this is a rdma series, and we are at the end of the cycle, > > > > I > > > > took the IFC file directly to the rdma tree instead of through > > > > the > > > > shared branch. > > > > > > > > Applied to for-next, thanks > > > > > > > > > > mmm, i was planing to resubmit this patch with the netdev real time > > > support series, since the uplink representor is getting delayed, I > > > thought I could submit the real time stuff today. can you wait on > > > the > > > ifc patch, i will re-send it today if you will, but it must go > > > through > > > the shared branch > > > > Friday of rc7 is a bit late to be sending new patches for the first > > time, isn't it?? > > I know, uplink representor last minute mess ! > > > > > But sure, if you update the shared branch right now I'll fix up > > rdma.git > > > > I can't put it in the shared brach without review, i will post it to > the netdev/rdma lists for two days at least for review and feedback. Well, I'm not going to take any different patches beyond right now unless Linus does a rc8?? Just move this one IFC patch to the shared branch, it is obviously OK Jason
