-----"Benjamin Coddington" <bcodding@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ----- >To: "Bernard Metzler" <BMT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >From: "Benjamin Coddington" <bcodding@xxxxxxxxxx> >Date: 02/12/2021 02:27PM >Cc: "Chuck Lever" <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-rdma" ><linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: directing soft iWARP traffic through a secure >tunnel > >On 12 Feb 2021, at 8:19, Bernard Metzler wrote: > >> How does this tunnel device look like? What does >> ifconfig or ip show? Probably NOARP and no >> HW address? > >right: > ># ip link show tun0 >3: tun0: <POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc >fq_codel state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 500 > ># ifconfig tun0 >tun0: flags=4305<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet6 fe80::6bbf:1def:b134:2eef prefixlen 64 scopeid >0x20<link> > inet6 fd51:5f56:d79b:a64e:64cc:5641:2916:7c4 prefixlen 64 >scopeid 0x0<global> > unspec 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 >txqueuelen 500 (UNSPEC) > RX packets 751 bytes 118096 (115.3 KiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 781 bytes 124142 (121.2 KiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > >> Or should I better setup a VPN client to your network >> to see what is needed? > >I can provide you with an openvpn config file that you can use to >connect to >our network under separate cover if you'd like. > great. let's take this off the list and come back with a proposed 3 lines patch. But, actually, I hope we do not see problems with the iwcm regarding address resolution. Best, Bernard.
