> Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@xxxxxxxxx> hat am 23. Mai 2018 um 23:37 geschrieben: > > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The PPPIOCDETACH ioctl effectively tries to "close" the given ppp file > before f_count has reached 0, which is fundamentally a bad idea. It > does check 'f_count < 2', which excludes concurrent operations on the > file since they would only be possible with a shared fd table, in which > case each fdget() would take a file reference. However, it fails to > account for the fact that even with 'f_count == 1' the file can still be > linked into epoll instances. As reported by syzbot, this can trivially > be used to cause a use-after-free. > > Yet, the only known user of PPPIOCDETACH is pppd versions older than > ppp-2.4.2, which was released almost 15 years ago (November 2003). > Also, PPPIOCDETACH apparently stopped working reliably at around the > same time, when the f_count check was added to the kernel, e.g. see > https://lkml.org/lkml/2002/12/31/83. Also, the current 'f_count < 2' > check makes PPPIOCDETACH only work in single-threaded applications; it > always fails if called from a multithreaded application. > > All pppd versions released in the last 15 years just close() the file > descriptor instead. > > Therefore, instead of hacking around this bug by exporting epoll > internals to modules, and probably missing other related bugs, just > remove the PPPIOCDETACH ioctl and see if anyone actually notices. Leave > a stub in place that prints a one-time warning and returns EINVAL. > > Reported-by: syzbot+16363c99d4134717c05b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > v2: leave a stub in place, rather than removing the ioctl completely. > > Documentation/networking/ppp_generic.txt | 6 ------ > drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c | 27 +++++------------------- > include/uapi/linux/ppp-ioctl.h | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/networking/ppp_generic.txt > b/Documentation/networking/ppp_generic.txt > index 091d20273dcb..61daf4b39600 100644 > --- a/Documentation/networking/ppp_generic.txt > +++ b/Documentation/networking/ppp_generic.txt > @@ -300,12 +300,6 @@ unattached instance are: > The ioctl calls available on an instance of /dev/ppp attached to a > channel are: > > -* PPPIOCDETACH detaches the instance from the channel. This ioctl is > - deprecated since the same effect can be achieved by closing the > - instance. In order to prevent possible races this ioctl will fail > - with an EINVAL error if more than one file descriptor refers to this > - instance (i.e. as a result of dup(), dup2() or fork()). > - > * PPPIOCCONNECT connects this channel to a PPP interface. The > argument should point to an int containing the interface unit > number. It will return an EINVAL error if the channel is already > diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c > index dc7c7ec43202..02ad03a2fab7 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c > @@ -605,30 +605,13 @@ static long ppp_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int > cmd, unsigned long arg) > > if (cmd == PPPIOCDETACH) { > /* > - * We have to be careful here... if the file descriptor > - * has been dup'd, we could have another process in the > - * middle of a poll using the same file *, so we had > - * better not free the interface data structures - > - * instead we fail the ioctl. Even in this case, we > - * shut down the interface if we are the owner of it. > - * Actually, we should get rid of PPPIOCDETACH, userland > - * (i.e. pppd) could achieve the same effect by closing > - * this fd and reopening /dev/ppp. > + * PPPIOCDETACH is no longer supported as it was heavily broken, > + * and is only known to have been used by pppd older than > + * ppp-2.4.2 (released November 2003). > */ > + pr_warn_once("%s (%d) used obsolete PPPIOCDETACH ioctl\n", > + current->comm, current->pid); > err = -EINVAL; > - if (pf->kind == INTERFACE) { > - ppp = PF_TO_PPP(pf); > - rtnl_lock(); > - if (file == ppp->owner) > - unregister_netdevice(ppp->dev); > - rtnl_unlock(); > - } > - if (atomic_long_read(&file->f_count) < 2) { > - ppp_release(NULL, file); > - err = 0; > - } else > - pr_warn("PPPIOCDETACH file->f_count=%ld\n", > - atomic_long_read(&file->f_count)); > goto out; > } > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ppp-ioctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/ppp-ioctl.h > index b19a9c249b15..784c2e3e572e 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/ppp-ioctl.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ppp-ioctl.h > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ struct pppol2tp_ioc_stats { > #define PPPIOCGIDLE _IOR('t', 63, struct ppp_idle) /* get idle time */ > #define PPPIOCNEWUNIT _IOWR('t', 62, int) /* create new ppp unit */ > #define PPPIOCATTACH _IOW('t', 61, int) /* attach to ppp unit */ > -#define PPPIOCDETACH _IOW('t', 60, int) /* detach from ppp unit/chan */ > +#define PPPIOCDETACH _IOW('t', 60, int) /* obsolete, do not use */ It's a bit late but ... i would suggest a stronger wording here. like /* removed 2003 */ for me "obsolete" sounds like "maybe it will be removed in a distant future" just my 2 cents, re, wh > #define PPPIOCSMRRU _IOW('t', 59, int) /* set multilink MRU */ > #define PPPIOCCONNECT _IOW('t', 58, int) /* connect channel to unit */ > #define PPPIOCDISCONN _IO('t', 57) /* disconnect channel */ > -- > 2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
