On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 02:37:38PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The PPPIOCDETACH ioctl effectively tries to "close" the given ppp file > before f_count has reached 0, which is fundamentally a bad idea. It > does check 'f_count < 2', which excludes concurrent operations on the > file since they would only be possible with a shared fd table, in which > case each fdget() would take a file reference. However, it fails to > account for the fact that even with 'f_count == 1' the file can still be > linked into epoll instances. As reported by syzbot, this can trivially > be used to cause a use-after-free. > > Yet, the only known user of PPPIOCDETACH is pppd versions older than > ppp-2.4.2, which was released almost 15 years ago (November 2003). > Also, PPPIOCDETACH apparently stopped working reliably at around the > same time, when the f_count check was added to the kernel, e.g. see > https://lkml.org/lkml/2002/12/31/83. Also, the current 'f_count < 2' > check makes PPPIOCDETACH only work in single-threaded applications; it > always fails if called from a multithreaded application. > > All pppd versions released in the last 15 years just close() the file > descriptor instead. > > Therefore, instead of hacking around this bug by exporting epoll > internals to modules, and probably missing other related bugs, just > remove the PPPIOCDETACH ioctl and see if anyone actually notices. Leave > a stub in place that prints a one-time warning and returns EINVAL. > > Reported-by: syzbot+16363c99d4134717c05b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
